![]() ![]() It loads resources one after another, where one resource has to wait for the previous resource to finish loading. HTTP/2 was designed to overcome the limitations of HTTP/1.1, making gRPC faster in terms of request response compared to REST. gRPC, on the other hand, utilizes HTTP/2, which is even faster for interprocess communication. REST uses HTTP/1.1 for communication, sending requests, and receiving responses. ![]() Performance and Efficiency: HTTP/1.1 VS HTTP/2 Serialization is the process of packaging the parameters and remote function into a binary message. On the other hand, Protobuf offers faster message delivery as the messages are serialized (encoded) into a binary format before being sent over the network. When transmitting data between systems, JSON tends to be slower. Both JSON and Protobuf are platform-independent, meaning they can be developed and used without being tied to a specific platform. GRPC uses Protobuf (Protocol Buffers) message format to send requests and receive responses in a binary format. While it is possible to receive messages in other formats such as XML or raw binary, JSON has become the de facto standard in best practices and tutorials due to its flexibility, efficiency, platform neutrality, and language independence. REST uses JSON format to receive messages. GRPC and REST have different formats for sending and receiving responses. Now, let's compare gRPC and REST across various aspects: Communication Flexibility: Protobuf and JSON In fact, gRPC should be compared with HTTP + RESTful because gRPC encompasses both the transport protocol and the messaging specification.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |